Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop
The portion where he implied morality is objective/universal, that adherence to morality = profit, & the whole nonsense of "coming together as one".
I understand what these words mean, but I don't understand how the **** he can believe such things. What's the logic?
|
Maybe morality wasn't the right word. The logic goes like this: imagine how much different the world would be and how much more we could achieve if humanity worked together. I'm not saying its possible, but the world we be a better place if everyone treated one another the way they wanted to be treated. I know it sounds stupid to a lot of people, but I don't see how you can't understand the logic behind it.