Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop
Right, which is one reason why in states with few electors there anti-federal tendencies are so high. Montana's one member of the house & three electors are essentially worthless, yet - despite this - the Federal Govt. owns 1/4th of land in the state....
|
I see the logic there, but given the sparsity of people there, what would be the alternative to Montana having its voice heard in the government? I'm sure there are lots of states like Montana.