Music Banter - View Single Post - Which genre hurt rock music in general more?
View Single Post
Old 07-12-2013, 01:57 PM   #21 (permalink)
positiveaob
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 27
Default

The term "Rock" is such a nebulous thing. It's tough to really call it dead or dying when you dont really have a good definition for what it is. I think in a lot of ways it just sort of morphed into the music we have today, which to me isn't bad at all. Rock and roll of the late sixties was a completely different beast than that of the fifties, and seventies was different than that of the sixties, and so on. Remember, probably the biggest selling group of the seventies was Abba. Not exactly hard-core rock and roll.

And keep in mind, whenever you look at music from a past era you're just thinking of the songs/groups that stood the test of time. There was plenty of junk back then also. It's the same way with literature. You can look at the classic novels from a period of time and think we've regressed since then but the reality is there was plenty of crap back then too. You just dont remember it or hear about it because it sucked and got forgotten about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forward To Death View Post
Rock hurt more due cause grunge new metal so popular no genre other make seem prominent otherwise these days.
Exactly.
positiveaob is offline   Reply With Quote