Blah, I think them as a art rock. Barret-era was psychedelic rock but then I'd rather follow George Starostin's footsteps and call them art rock, but does it really matter?
And yeah, I will revisit Animals, since in this case I would like to be wrong- I mean, if everyone else find them to be great, I would also like to learn to find out what makes them great, so I'm gonna try again.
The Wall, though, would be a classic if it were not a double album. It includes too many fillers and bores for me.
|