Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian Benteke
You just said it was porn though? There could be any number of reasons for owning those books, if he even did own them. If this guy is committed enough to nonce why wouldn't he be committed enough to get some real porn?
MJ didn't break any rules.
You can't say there's no question he was a paedo when the crux of your argument is 'sort of proof' and assumptions you've made yourself.
It's not a stretch but that means nothing. It doesn't make him guilty.
|
I'm not tryna go to court and convict him lol. The files weren't explicit illegal child porn but they contained pics of young nsked boys in books. Think what you want of that but I font kno any non pedophiles who have a handful of books around with naked 12 yr old boys. D o you?? These aren't asdumptions lol its factual he had nany pics of nude ir semi nude young boys in his possession so what other definition do you use for pedo