What is "reasonable expectation not to have secret photos taken up her skirt when she goes out in public"? What does this say? A woman should feel guilty for having these pictures taken because she should expect that some guy with a phone is out there waiting to take pictures to satisfy his perversion? What message does this send? That perverts can get away with it because the person is not nude? That ruling is what scares me most in this. It is no different than slut shaming, putting the blame on the female for wearing a short skirt. That because she chose to do so, it is justifiable to exploit her for this choice. That is frightening. The fact that the supreme court, or any court for that matter can now say they have control over the safety and security of these people, and rule that they have say in your private parts is very scary.
__________________
last.fm
"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.
|