Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon
The lines that get drawn vary from person to person. It doesn't matter if those conditions are proven to be harmless. It will still be viewed as wrong in their eyes while allowing for other practices to be perfectly fine.
|
So... if no one is being harmed then it's still wrong? That is the definition of irrational. You're defending a position with nonsense because you don't want to admit that you have no position. You can use your same non-argument to defend homophobia: no one is being hurt, but some people think it's gross. So, I guess it makes sense for those people to call it wrong. Or at least you'll defend their position if nothing else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR.
Why wouldn't they be able to contract std's? They contract anything from aids to leukemia.
|
Google and Wikipedia strike again. Apparently you can't get or transmit STDs from/to animals. It mentions infections or other kinds of diseases, but it only mentioned animals giving them to humans. I'd assume the opposite would be true, but it didn't mention it. And even if you can give an animal a disease, that doesn't address my basic point. If there is no harm, is there a foul?
Zoophilia and health - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia