Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth
i disagree tbh. just saying something doesn't make it so. seems like a pretty straight forward comparison to me.
|
Really? You can't tell the difference between a subjugated population rising up against their oppressor to have a say in their own land and a highly mobile terrorist unit that strikes wherever it chooses.?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian Benteke
Dunno if you lot have seen it but 1:35 onward. Funniest thing I've seen in a long time (it's not true ftr, bit about London has some truth to it), it's like something Brass Eye would do.
#FoxNewsFacts on Twitter.
|
The video's a load of bollocks, they've confused ethnic zones in principal European cities as quasi mini-muslim states as no go areas, when the reality is that a lot of communities especially Asian and Middle Eastern are known for living in their own communities until they become more integrated into society as a whole (Asians especially in the UK are slower here than other races but they still get there) and finally branch out from the zones that they first lived in.
The so-called no go areas are areas left by the police for two reasons. 1) because the area is a lost cause due to its crime and is usually just a small area anyway or 2) the Police as is the case in Europe, often have a low-level approach to immigrant areas as a whole, for race relations and stuff etc, and in my mind that shows good sense.
Not only did the two in the video lack any real knowledge of what they were talking about but also had a stuttering phase to emphasize it even more.