i didn't go back and read your earlier posts from this thread, no. this thread is 30 something pages long ffs. i read the posts that happened since we started this discussion. and actually it's not even really fair to say i specifically picked this argument with you. i was arguing with chula & unknown soldier and you jumped in. but when i said the stuff about not compromising i was explaining why i think they were wrong to harp on about how the magazine should've handled the whole thing better.
you might've noticed our free speech stance was the same, but you were more caught up in trying to 'prove me wrong' that non-violence can't work when i never said it couldn't. and i love how now that i actually proved your last few posts wrong you're switching topics yet again. you can run but you can't hide
|