Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista
|
He's probably one of the kinds of people I'm talking about, and isn't likely to serve any non-scientific benefit to society, so in theory I wouldn't be opposed to removing him as a threat in a permanent fashion. But if he could be studied, and if the information we might gain from him could lead to eventually -- in a decade, or a century, or whatever -- saving more lives by using him as "psychological guinea pig" than we would by simply executing him, then wouldn't it be in our best interests to keep him alive?
If you just want revenge, then put on a shirt with a white skull and become a Charles Bronson-esque vigilante, but if you want to save lives, then get over yourself and start coming at the issue from a logical standpoint. As it is you aren't serving justice, just your own self-indulgent desire for retribution, and I have no interest in or respect for that.