Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord
**** that ****. "Must of" rolls off the tongue way better than "must have".
|
Bollocks! You can't justify bad grammar just because "it sounds better". You stupid kids! Grrrrr! You can say "must of" phonetically but if you're writing it then it is "must have". Did you ever see a newspaper (remember them kids?) where the columnist said "The man must of been guilty?" Me arse! Stop trying to wriggle out of it and admit you have been caught by Das Naszischen Grammenbanfurhrer! Expect us when you least expect us.
Also "must've" is a shortened version, I'm sure you know, of "must have" --- "of" does not have "v" or "e" in it...
Again, stupid kids! Buy a dictionary! NO not online! Gaaaahhhhh!
