Music Banter - View Single Post

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 10-02-2015, 09:33 PM

no offense dude but you seem to be under the false impression that the economy has a lot to do with who is president

clinton was lucky to be prez in the 90's. if bush was prez in the 90's you'd see similar results. same with obama.

the economy is mostly a matter of circumstance... not saying a prez can't help or hurt the situation. but the reason obama has bad numbers is cause he became president when he did. overall, his economic policies are hardly even that different from bush, or clinton for that matter.

ironically enough a lot of the growth in the 90's was a part of the same boom that eventually went bust in 2007, leading to obama's abysmal numbers. a lot of that was due to downright poor/dishonest business practices... which extend all the way back to the 90s economy from which they sprang.

10-02-2015, 09:33 PM	#28 (permalink)
~~John Wilkes Booth~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,235	no offense dude but you seem to be under the false impression that the economy has a lot to do with who is president clinton was lucky to be prez in the 90's. if bush was prez in the 90's you'd see similar results. same with obama. the economy is mostly a matter of circumstance... not saying a prez can't help or hurt the situation. but the reason obama has bad numbers is cause he became president when he did. overall, his economic policies are hardly even that different from bush, or clinton for that matter. ironically enough a lot of the growth in the 90's was a part of the same boom that eventually went bust in 2007, leading to obama's abysmal numbers. a lot of that was due to downright poor/dishonest business practices... which extend all the way back to the 90s economy from which they sprang. Last edited by John Wilkes Booth; 10-02-2015 at 09:43 PM.