Music Banter - View Single Post - Were songs from the 80s/90s catchier than today?
View Single Post
Old 10-20-2015, 02:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
ReadyMadeFour64
Music Addict
 
ReadyMadeFour64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RJDG14 View Post
Being 15, I ask others my age this question and they all say that they prefer music released now. However, I was listening to a compilation of early REM earlier, and found a number of tracks very catchy (including Cuyahoga and Radio Free Europe). The same goes for Husker Du (Games or Don't Want to Know If You Are Lonely), Primal Scream (Gentle Tuesday) and U2 (Pride). Then I look at the current mainstream chart, very little seems quite as memorable, and even virtually all rock/alternative feels like there is no interesting melody, not to mention that almost every singer (including those of older groups) now uses pitch correction. Others my age seem to claim the opposite though, saying that they find what I like more forgettable.

Is it that tunes were more memorable in the 1980s and 1990s (meaning that new ideas are harder to create), or that I have a dated taste for what I find catchy? Have all the catchy melodies run out, or simply that I perceive catchy as different to most now? Two examples of tracks with melodies that I dislike and others like are Hold Back the River by James Bay and Photograph by Ed Sheeran.

Today is just booming bass and horrible synths. Yes the 80s and 90s had it too, but it is everywhere nowadays. I would say the 80s/90s were better.
__________________
My Music Label:
https://6stringrecords.bandcamp.com/

Label Website:

My Music Blog and Other Music Stuff:
https://sites.google.com/site/readymademusicarchive/

Twitter: ThisIsReadyade
Instagram: ReadyMadeFour64
YouTube: ThisIs ReadyMade
Music Channel: ReadyMade Reviews
ReadyMadeFour64 is offline   Reply With Quote