Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrapin_Station
I'm going to assume that you're talking about at least a simplification of conventionally accepted "good technique" a la music schools, private music teachers, etc., sure.
But to an extent, assuming that there are anything like universals in that realm is a fiction, and why would we kowtow to it and pretend that it's anything more than it is, re using it to refer to a "favorite"/"best" distinction? That just promotes misconceptions and fallacies--it leads folks to accept argumentum ad populums as having some sort of weight for truth value.
|
No offense, but you're like
that guy who seemingly pops up in every somewhat philosophical discussion and just keeps repeating 'define x' and feels all deep about it.
It's not that I disagree and at times we have to define or redefine what we're talking about, but mostly it's really unnecessary, tiresome and doesn't add anything to the discussion at hand.
Also: Define define.