Quote:
Originally Posted by innerspaceboy
Spotify and other streaming services are inherently flawed systems as rights litigation results in an infinitesimal percentage of recorded music being actualy accessible to consumers via these services. It cripples the breadth and depth of cultural awareness, reducing it to a small fraction of licensable popular song.
It is equally misguided to think that such a service benefits the artists. Studies demonstrate that the majority of artists compensated by streaming services earn far less than minimum wage from their play count.
And streaming without actual ownership of media is dangerous to the public good. It conditions communities to be satisfied with paying for content that they never actually possess. This entrusts access to cultural works entirely to the whims of gatekeeper corporations which is never good for the artists or for their listeners.
Those who think that streaming is the solution for media consumption in the digital age are sorely mistaken.
|
I don't think anyone is suggesting that musicians make any significant money from Spotify royalties. Many of them, however, think of streaming services as primarily an exposure tool, much the same as the role played by radio in earlier decades. People like myself use Spotify for pre-listening to decide whether or not to buy, and may also decide "Hmmm, wouldn't mind seeing that band in concert".