Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon
It would be worth having another product to overcharge for but you are forgetting the biggest point of it all. Why end something when you can end up overcharging for the a product that a person will consistently need for decades to come. It doesn't make sense to just take one quick sum and run away. Think about the long run and the bigger picture.
|
It would also be a lot more profitable for American Apparel if they used sweatshops to produce their clothing, therefore American Apparel uses sweatshops? I don't think so. Your argument is based on too much speculation and what-iffing for me to take it seriously.
Quote:
|
I don't have the answer to that one at all but why do you think they haven't done it yet if it's such an easily obtainable thing to just shakedown the whole industry?
|
Is it easy? I certainly don't think so, and that's kind of my point.