Quote:
Originally Posted by William_the_Bloody
It matters because she used corruption to subvert the Democratic process and the will of the people in her favour, whether Bernie had a shot or not.
|
Care to spell out exactly how SHE used corruption? The DNC's job is to win both nationally and state wise. Everyone except blind idealists knew that a Sanders presidency would've been as limp and ineffective as Batlord's wiener after two six packs.
I simply can not believe how vilified Clinton is based on nothing more than assumptions and people getting sucked into the negative group think that's been built up around her by the GOP and media. Again, the five rules for reporting on Clinton:
1) Everything, no matter how ludicrous-sounding, is worthy of a full investigation by federal agencies, Congress, the "vast right-wing conspiracy," and mainstream media outlets.
2) Every allegation, no matter how ludicrous, is believable until it can be proven completely and utterly false. And even then, it keeps a life of its own in the conservative media world.
3) The media assumes that Clinton is acting in bad faith until there's hard evidence otherwise.
4) Everything is newsworthy because the Clinton's are the equivalent of America's royal family.
5) Everything she does is fake and calculated for maximum political benefit.
Yes, she messed up with her emails. She's being scolded for it but not a single official criminal charge has been brought up and/or proven.
Would love to see Putin order his hackers to go after the GOP and leak their dirty laundry. Where's the outrage over Trump's buddy trying to undermine the democratic process and secure a Trump win by going after high level democrats?