Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
Gee
Sorry for the lack of clarity
Put it like this: if it appealed to simpleton dilweeds back then time doesn't make it any better
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
I don't know. When you finish grieving for Princess Leia you can over and check.
|
Two extremely insensitive things in one thread said by the one person. Well done. Respect for the dead, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
No.
|
In your opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
There isn't some kind of objective suck meter we can run songs through. If someone believes that the song subjectively sucks, it does to them and you can't really say that they're right or wrong on an objective level. You can say that it doesn't suck and it's on the same level of subjectivity. This is such a simple concept that I'm surprised that it comes up so often on the forums.
So, if a song sucks to you, then you saying that the song sucks doesn't need clarification as to who thinks it sucks.
|
The title of the thread leads one to believe that the OP meant that it sucks generally, which I would take to mean, had no real merit. FFS, I can say rap or punk sucks; doesn't make it so. Of course you can be objective when you're basically asking people to vote or comment on music that has been around for decades. You can't simply dismiss a whole genre by saying it sucks. Isn't this what you all got on my back for about jazz?
What about your music? If I say it sucks, does it suck? If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it, does Frownland make music out of it?