Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart
My main argument against it is the amount of work it entails and also that yet again I have to remind you that of everyone who has posted here, only, so far as I can see, you and Batty are putting this idea forward. I had plenty of ideas, which were decent ones for categories, as I mentioned in the first few posts, but they were overruled for the decades thing, which I agreed with. So it's not like I'm being unreasonable. We should go with what the majority wants, not just two people, or one. Would you not agree with that?
|
I think people either don't care, don't want to throw themselves into this long discussion, or even know that it's a point of discussion since it's buried under a bunch of accusations of rudeness and such. I will help with compiling once we decide what to do, of course, as I already have been.
Thoughts on this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
A case for network lists: The 90s onward really established certain networks as cartoon channels and mainstays of the field, namely Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network (which can be divided into Cartoon Cartoon and Adult Swim), and potentially Nicktoons. I simply don't think that 20 a decade could encompass all of the shows from these networks appropriately, and a wild card option--while not a bad idea and one that I think we should use for any additional shows people might want on here--doesn't seem like a better alternative since it'll be more of a miscellaneous set instead of an actual theme, which I think would make the rounds a lot more interesting. I think you might just not be aware of how relevant to the cartoon world the attachment to the networks is since you aren't American and it was outside of your generation.
|