Music Banter - View Single Post - Metallica VS. Iron Maiden (Preference)
View Single Post
Old 02-09-2006, 05:07 AM   #130 (permalink)
Seltzer
Fish in the percolator!
 
Seltzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hobbit Land NZ
Posts: 2,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild7Dustr
As in listen and you can tell an obvious difference!!!

Metallica was obviously much more influential to metal throughout there career than maiden ever was or will be!!!Maiden is more like rock with some leads and a "soaring"/high pitched voice, while metallica was more crunch/thrash heavy metal with obviously many well calculated double bass drum beats, clearly making a much more (heavy) metal sound!!!

If you still can't "hear" it, then I guess you'll just have to keep on listening!!!
Your choice, crow!!!
Metallica sounds more thrashy because they're thrash/speed metal.

Iron Maiden is definitely heavy metal. Just remember that metal can have high pitched talented vocals. And also remember that Led Zeppelin was once considered heavy metal. Heavy music has many definitions.

I wouldn't say Metallica is definitely more influential. In terms of numbers of fans, yes. But Iron Maiden did more for metal than Metallica did. Maiden led NWOBHM and practically created power metal. Metallica really didn't do a huge amount for thrash.

And also, Nicko McBrain is ten times the drummer that Ulrich is .
__________________
Seltzer is offline