Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista
How so? He was trying to equate the vote on the Iraq war with the vote on experimental drugs in a way to try and deflate the unanimous nature of the vote. He screwed the pooch using the phrase "close to unanimous".
77 to 23 is quite far removed from "close to unanimous".
See, even Frowny ****s up sometimes.
|
No, the point, my thick-headed friend, was that overwhelming political support for something doesn't mean it's not garbage. You're just being a pedant. And not a very good one.