It's worth recognizing for communicative purposes. It's far from an acknowledgement of the validity of said divine law.
And no, it's not circular reasoning in the slightest. My point was that divine law is something that's more or less clear cut and definable, which is evidence of the divine law existing. It's not evidence of it being a valid law genuinely written by God, but it is evidence that divine law exists as a communicable concept that you can use to define sinners by regardless of your opinion on it.
I'm reminded of my "dats not music" discussions on here.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.
|