I think there is an in between here that makes both of you kind of correct. IF we don't change things we are probably approaching capacity, but technology has a lot to offer so I don't think we have a good grasp of potential capacity with the use of technology not yet discovered, developed, or implemented.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
Here’s a fact that isn’t very confusing. We count people by the billions and other large animal by the thousands. Just the numbers of gorillas and elephants vs people say it all. If you think that’s a reasonable balance you’re stupid. If you look at that J Curve population growth chart and not get that it. ****ing Jesus.
|
Lol. What? That's a non-point if I've ever heard one. What the **** does the ratio of elephants to people have to do with the amount of people the earth can sustain? Why do we have to be balanced with other species? Ants outnumber us by far and fungus dominates the planet. How do you feel about the ratio of bacteria to humans?