Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre
Yeah, and that question has tons of nuances to explore to really make it an easy decision.
But the most dishonest thing about that question is that it acts like morality is a dichotomy between either right or wrong when there is tons of grey area. Shouldn't be "Is it good to kill a child to save 100 people?" but instead "Is it better to kill a child to save 100 people?" because killing the child is always going to be immoral on a certain level simply because it will cause suffering.
|
by that logic it's "immoral on a certain level" to give your kid a flu shot