Music Banter - View Single Post - KISS- why not retire??
View Single Post
Old 04-08-2006, 08:52 PM   #178 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ?
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer
well, I'll give you my opinion.

They are a 60s band to me because that is when they actually played on their own records, rather than hiring session guys to play on the albums, and then hiring 15 back up players to go on tour with them.

While it is true their career spans decades, the 60s is really PURE STONES. im not saying post 60s Stones 'doesnt count' I'm saying that the 60s Stones is DEFINATIVE stones, not some disco album from 1978 that session players are doing the work on.
Errr what?

The Stones didn`t make a disco album in 1978.In fact Keith Richards said he was listening to a lot of punk when Some Girls was recorded.Yes it had a discoish track in Miss You , but then Kiss had I Was Made For Loving You , Shandi & virtually everything on the Unmasked album.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote