Yes I understand what you're saying and it's baseless speculation to prop up a conspiracy theory you have 0 evidence for.
They were asked to determine whether it was a lab invention/mistake or something that evolved naturally, and they determined the latter. You are somehow assuming they wouldn't take into consideration the mechanism you're arguing could've produced it despite the fact that they do this for a living and you don't.
All based on what? China is corrupt? Blood clots? Or is it just to defend your boy Trump?
|