Quote:
Originally Posted by jwb
Essentially the premise I challenged... That the idea of nobody using force in the absence of a monopoly of force by the state is remotely plausible.
|
I felt like a sufficiently conceded that point.
The idea of creating a new taboo or arguing it doesn’t matter what you believe or support seemed indicative enough that I see that.
What I don’t concede is that my political goals being wildly unrealistic should alter them.
I think it may be even more worthwhile to hope for the impossible.
Medicare for All isn’t going to happen. Neither is a peaceful anarchist utopia.
0=0