Originally Posted by rostasi

Look, I understand that English is not your first language, but when you norg out a sentence that is practically indecipherable, we all have to do our best to try to interpret what you are actually saying. When you offer a comment that, to some, may seem ridiculous, then you have to be able to hear why. This is called a dialogue.

What I got from your statement about the Siouxsie track is that it would’ve been a bigger hit if it were released in the 90s ... and I’m saying that I can’t see how, because not only did it not fit in with what was considered popular music at that time, but when the 90s hit, the band was desperately trying almost anything to stay relevant and broke up soon after getting dropped by Polydor.

When I give you advice on how to not keep uploading these “skeeter-in-your-face” pictures by recommending something like Imgur ... or when I get confused about some strange, earnest, off-topic thing that you drop right in the middle of a specific thread ... or when you chula us with the same pictures while tying them to some distant relatives that strangers would normally respond to in the same way people respond to other people’s dream stories, I, and others, tend to tell you about it not because we’re trying to “pick [you] up”, but trying to figure out what the hell you’re going on about. If you weren’t expecting a “serious response back”, then what was the point of your response to my statement?

People make ridiculous statements all the time here - nothing new - but dialogue, sometimes heated, happens afterwards. If we start a thread about whether the moon landing was faked, you can start chiming in on the benefits of green cheese, but don’t be surprised if you get some blowback [no matter how much you think it’s (backwards) relevant].