Quote:
Originally Posted by bob_32_116
Precisely. Anyone can say anything about anybody on the internet, and "defamatory" is the right word to describe it. If the OP has any evidence of wrongdoing, he/she should take it to the right authorities - the police, or whoever. I believe the saying is "Put up or shut up".
I would add that anyone who finds a musician's work disturbing, for any reason, has the option of not listening.
|
Would you argue that the financial gains of Savilles TV media appearances and Glitter et all musical offerings (vinyl and cassette or cds sold..) further funded their lifestyles which was far to LATER proved to of helped in the harm of children? I would say it did!!
The whole point is having something alluded to that cannot be proven in the case of the Saville case we learned proof or evidence was ALWAYS lacking.
Which is abit like knowing bears defacate in the woods but since no one is filming it or able to document it means it can be argued they don't defacate at all, not in the woods or anywhere.
I make NO ACCUSATIONS I simply want to attain what the motive is for the duo's clear focus on children (minors) which is replete with adult themes mixed in (sex, satanism, pornography)...or what that adds to the otherwise musical listening experience?
Can you answer that?