Quote:
Originally Posted by Mucha na Dziko
He doesn't like the negative vibes of a "hate" thread.
Therefore he told us what he loves
|
It's not negative, it's meant to be a bit of fun. TBH I don't give two ****s what he likes or loves, that was not the question and he didn't even answer it in a musical vein so it's a totally pointless post. If he doesn't like the "negative vibes" then why not stay out of the thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mucha na Dziko
If you believe she was crazy when saying this, then why don't you think she was crazy when accusing Jackson?
|
There was plenty of evidence. Didn't you see the interview? She wasn't crazy, as in, didn't know what she was saying in terms of accusations; she just went over the top and ****ed her own testimony and tainted it by going bat**** crazy. Maybe she wasn't; I don't know. But she didn't help her case and it soon collapsed. He was clearly guilty and to be honest you're, as Guybrush said, pretty stupidly naive if you think he wasn't.
Tell me, do you think OJ was innocent? He got off too, so he must not have done it, right?
Edit: Also, you're the one who's brought the "hate vibe" into the thread. Up to now it was, as it was intended to be, pretty light-hearted with some verbal fencing and a few verbal kicks in the verbal bal... ance of opinion. From my OP:
Give reasons if you want but
you don't have to.
So anyone can vote for Jackson without explaining why. You were the one, if I recall, who demanded to know why, and now it's exploded into a whole weird defence of him when you clearly don't know what you're talking about. If Jackson had been an ordinary, non-wealthy person accused of these crimes he would be in jail now. It was only his celebrity status and his money that saved him. **** Jackson, may he rot in hell, the ****.