I truly have no idea why Dawkins wanted to waste is time on such an idiotic conversation.
I mean, I do know why. He wanted to "spread the word"
But in all honesty, she should've chosen a better "religious" television program.
If the interviewer is this dumb, then the entire TV station has to be this dumb.
And the viewers.
So what's the point?
On the second hand, I think Dawkins might've explained his point much better.
The way he says it here, is mostly understandable for people who are familiar with the theory of evolution, not for people who were tought something entirely different their whole life.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marie Monday
This thread reads like the synopsis of a tv series, in a good way
|
|