Condenser vs. Dynamic:
Condenser microphones are generally more sensitive and capture a broader range of frequencies, making them great for capturing the nuances of vocals and acoustic instruments. They're commonly used in studio environments.
Dynamic microphones, like the Shure SV 200 you mentioned, are more rugged and are often used for live performances. They are less sensitive but can handle higher sound pressure levels, making them suitable for louder sources like guitar amps and drums.
Since you're recording vocals in a normal room and aiming for an indie sound, a condenser microphone might be more suitable for capturing the details of your voice.
Options you mentioned:
IK Multimedia Irig XLR Studio and Voxtaker 100: It's challenging to provide a specific recommendation without detailed reviews or personal experiences. However, it's worth checking online reviews or user feedback to get an idea of how well these microphones perform in your desired application.
Shure SV 200:
The Shure SV 200 is a dynamic microphone and is known for being durable and versatile. While it may not capture the fine details of your voice as a condenser might, it could still give you a decent sound, especially if you're going for a more raw and indie vibe.
Recording Environment:
Since you're recording in a regular room, consider addressing any room noise or reflections. You can do this by recording in a space with minimal background noise, using blankets or other soft materials to absorb sound, or using a reflection filter.
Budget Considerations:
If your budget is tight, it might be worth investing in a good condenser microphone when possible. However, you can still achieve decent results with a dynamic microphone like the Shure SV 200 for now.
ebxya.com
|