Ok, but if a band made music that they chose not to play live would that make them bad musicians?... If you believe that, then you likely think The Beatles are bad musicians.
In which case i would have to punch you in the face.
Theres nothing wrong with prefering live music to studio music... But i don't see the logic behind how one way is a good way and another way is not... If a band can suck in the studio and be good live and that makes them a good band, it shouldn't be any different if a ban sucks live but are good in the studio.
|