Music Banter - View Single Post - The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 08-29-2006, 12:30 PM   #318 (permalink)
boo boo
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer
Because the Stones had more line-ups than the Beatles, I think there's more variety to what The Stones can offer, be it Brian Jones era Stones, be it Mick Taylor era Stones or Ron Wood era Stones. You get a little more variety with the Stones.
Stones has more variety than The Beatles?

Holy mother of god I hope you're joking.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
boo boo is offline