Music Banter - View Single Post - The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 09-01-2006, 10:22 PM   #333 (permalink)
ShadowSurfer
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Side II of Band Of Gypsies
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
Both became popular by playing rock n roll, but when both started going psychedelic in 67 it's fairly obvious which one pulled it off and which one did not.
That's merely your opinion.Some would say 2000 Light Years From Home is just as definative psychadelia as anything the Beatles put out there. And who are you kidding? The Beatles stole that whole trip from Brian Wilson and Pet Sounds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
The Beatles could change it up song after song, and thats one reason they are considered to be the more innovative band, they were doing everything including the kitchen sink at a time when such things were not heard of in rock music, let alone acceptible,
Ya, right. The Beatles admit they stole it all from Brian Wilson and Pet Sounds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
The Stones were more important when it came to the attitude elements of modern music, but The Beatles are respsonsable for the experimental aspect of it,
As I said, Pet Sounds predates anything experimental by The Beatles.
ShadowSurfer is offline