Music Banter - View Single Post - Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd
View Single Post
Old 12-29-2006, 10:47 AM   #39 (permalink)
riseagainstrocks
Music Addict
 
riseagainstrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
haha.

What are people's issues with Nickleback? Nickleback are, COMMERCIALLY speaking, a good band! They write catchy melodies and hooks that are radio-friendly. They churn out hit after hit.

Now, don't get me wrong - sure, their music may be derivative, unoriginal, redundant, clichéd, even ridiculous, but your casual music listener likes it! They write for the mainstream masses, and among those bands who are attempting to do this and have this in mind when writing, Nickleback are pretty much the best of the lot!

Commercial rock ain't art, folks. The purpose is to design a product and make as much money out of it as possible. It's a craft. And these Canadians are skilled craftsmen...if (obviously) not particularly musically talented or virtuosic.
Best post of the year? I agree with every bit of it. Nickleback are garbage. BUT THAT'S THE POINT! People who actually like music aren't supposed to like them. It's radio-friendly background music.
__________________
One note timeless, came out of nowhere...
riseagainstrocks is offline