Music Banter - View Single Post - Pop a watered-down version of other genres? Unfair generalization, I say.
View Single Post
Old 04-16-2007, 04:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
Rainard Jalen
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperInfinity View Post
What pop "actually is" is described on wikipedia and in various dictionaries and she is pretty much dead on in what she said. If you want to define pop as being something else... that's fine. But for the rest of us, that's not pop.
No. What she described is one sub-genre of pop. The fact is, there are loads and loads of varieties of pop music. Pop could be extended to include things like dream-pop, noise-pop, even wildly experimental bordering-on-avant-garde stuff by bands like Deerhoof. The full range of indie and alternative pop, in fact, can equally be classified as pop. Not just bubblegum, urban and so forth.

With that said, it is true that pleasant melodies are usually important to pop music. But that the lyrical content must be basic is nonsense. Perhaps most chart pop these days, yes. But not pop in all its shapes and forms. And "catchy melodies" isn't really much of a definition, is it. 90%+ of all music strives to have memorable melodies, even a lot of metal.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote