The Stones sound like a blues cover band. They're just a run of the mill blue eyed soul band as far as I'm concerned.
Aerosmith borrowed a lot more from The Yardbirds and Zep than they did from the Stones anyway. Add on to that the fact that Aerosmith has a frontman that actually sings. I don't really get why they are compared so much other than that they both cover a generic blues rock style and share an obsession for whores and heroin, or is it because both bands have singers with oversized mouths and guitarists who should have been dead 30 years ago?
Last edited by boo boo; 07-24-2007 at 04:51 PM.
|