Originally Posted by i get high sometimes

people get the idea that we are so advanced that we can just make bold statements like "Unicorns are/aren't real"

Originally Posted by i get high sometimes

cannot disprove the Flying Spaghetti Monster or the Invisible Pink Unicorn either, and it is glaringly obvious that all three do not exist.

Originally Posted by i get high sometimes

it must be applied to all things which science cannot disprove, which includes all of the aforesaid things, Unicorns, Goblins, trolls, etc. Why can't you say that it is futile to argue the existance of goblins?

Originally Posted by i get high sometimes

So unless you can honestly come out and say that it is pointless to argue the existance of goblins, trolls, mermaids, the flying spaghetti monster, and unicorns

Originally Posted by i get high sometimes

You have said that asserting God's non-existance is bold, so therefore, by your logic, asserting the non-existance of Goblins must also be bold, but certainly you do not believe that. Which is why I can say with the same amount of confidence "God does not exist" that I can say "Goblins do not exist".

Originally Posted by i get high sometimes

There was nothing circular about my arguments.