Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
/smashes head against desk
You're such a PC, sterilized, soulless, fence rider. The entire point of the post is to present your opinion as empirical fact, not waltz in like some high and mighty, pedantic, condescending encyclopedia. This site ain't big enough for two of us, and if I think you're bad...you're bad.
|
I'm not at all like you describe me.
I'm simply intelligent and mature enough to realize that people have their own primarily emotion-based opinions about certain musicians. People can argue back and forth for hours about who is better, but in the end nobody's mind will be changed. Nothing will be proven either way, and it usually just ends up in hard feelings.
Unlike you, I won't waste my time trying to prove something that can't really be proven, and I'm certainly not going to smash my head against a desk over it.
I'm not a fence rider, I have my personal opinion as to who is better--Neil Peart. Nobody can accuse me of having that opinion simply because they think I'm a Rush fanboy--because I actually prefer the Who's whole body of music over that of Rush.
I'm just not going to waste my time by getting all huffy-puffy and arguing about it.
And your above post proves you're as condescending as anybody at Music Banter. Sorry you feel the need to make personal attacks on people you don't even know.