Music Banter - View Single Post - Emo, timeless?
Thread: Emo, timeless?
View Single Post
Old 02-19-2005, 06:47 AM   #13 (permalink)
Sneer
Let it drip
 
Sneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zealious
Oh yeah, and the Beatles suck. Beatles have no amount of creativity. If you noticed they're just another idolized pop band. They did not pioneer anything new, they were simply making music associated at that time, which sounded like most bands in that age. I'd rather listen to dead emo music
firstly, perhaps you should add "in my opinion" after saying they suck because really, a band that has the most number ones and the highest selling british album of all time do not suck. yes, they were over-commercialised in the beginning, and yes, they were slightly overrated but isnt that like most emo now? and their psychedelic was not mere pop, it was highly creative, whereas emo to me is just generic rubbish where all frontmen are the same and all songs are similiar. at least the beatles actually changed and developed their sound.
Sneer is offline   Reply With Quote