Music Banter - View Single Post - Emo, timeless?
Thread: Emo, timeless?
View Single Post
Old 02-21-2005, 01:15 PM   #21 (permalink)
ArtistInTheAmbulance
enchanted.
 
ArtistInTheAmbulance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cornwailles, angleterre.
Posts: 2,537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by This_isnt_highschool
just to bring you back to the beatles argument...personally i think theyre great, not just for their music but just for the significance (aware i cant spell that) factor, i mean we wouldnt have half the bands we do now if it werent for them, as with The Smiths, i LOVE them, but i also love BrandNew and similar bands who strongly take their influence from them...so you cant just say that they suck because i can guarentee that at least one of the bands you like has taken alot of influence from the beatles, so rather than saying they suck you should be repsecting them for bringing you the music you like
^THERE YOU GO! Thats true.. Ok I have no way of making that point without repeating any of what she said, Im not thinking quite straight at the mo... Buuut she's right, so many bands will be influenced by the beatles, so even if you didnt like the beatles themselves, you can appreciate what they did for music.. Which Im betting you dont, and fair enough, cos people dont tend to agree on musical type things, which is good I suppose, otherwise we'd all be the same and musicbanter would suck so many eggs... Fleh and Im still talking.

In summary; Im with her^ I can appreciate what the beatles did for the music scene, although I wouldnt chose to listen to them. Wow, sorry for the really un-understandable psot, Im not really with it today...
__________________
shake your wings like theyre laced with sound!
ArtistInTheAmbulance is offline   Reply With Quote