Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayfarer
Ah, sorry, you're right. For some reason, I took, "How can society progress when the government simply forces a subjective notion of good and bad," as an implication that you supported anarchist ideals. It'sa bit late, hah.
I agree though. Problem is, where does one draw the line? What constitutes "harm"? I personally see, for instance, denying someone a job solely because of their ethnicity as doing harm.
|
I already tackled this example. That person who was denied a job isn't physically or financially worse off than they were before applying for the job, except for the money they willingly spent or was taken from other means. You didn't harm them, you just chose not to help them.