Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles

Urban Hat€monger ? · 03-19-2008, 06:25 PM

I think you have to realise 2 things when taking this thread in account.

First that it's over 2 years old.
Second that at the time it was made it seemed like everytime the Beatles were mentioned it was at the expense of the Stones , and everytime you mentioned something you like about the Stones you'd get Beatles fans saying 'oh but the Beatles were better blah blah blah'. and not giving the Stones credit for a single thing.
This was my way of poking fun at these people.

03-19-2008, 06:25 PM	#54 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I think you have to realise 2 things when taking this thread in account. First that it's over 2 years old. Second that at the time it was made it seemed like everytime the Beatles were mentioned it was at the expense of the Stones , and everytime you mentioned something you like about the Stones you'd get Beatles fans saying 'oh but the Beatles were better blah blah blah'. and not giving the Stones credit for a single thing. This was my way of poking fun at these people. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.