Kurt Cobain wasn't much of a vocalist either and as for the musical thing so? This is why I hate debating certain covers that everyone deems bad because the band itself is bad. While the reality is there's nothing wrong with the cover they bitch about the music either being the same as it was before and critisizing them saying they should've done something with it or there's the other side of it where the band did do something with it and people complain about them taking too much artistic liberty and butchering the original. I realize Flyleaf can't win but the reality is it's just another decent Nirvana cover, not better than the original but certainly nowhere near the worst offender.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
|
|