Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
Sudden expert on Crass now are we?
So a band who were formed from an anarchist commune who lived in squats , were signed to a tiny independent label and who used most of their royalties to promote loads of anti globalization , anti war , feminist & enviromental causes were 'selling the rebellious anarchist' image.
OK then  |
Yes they promoted 'causes' so does U2, one of the most rediculously commercial bands there is, U2 was just better at it.
Using music to
label and promote a cause (as oppose to express it without wheedling or rallying your audience) is a very sell-outy/dishonest thing to do. If someone wants to use music to express thier feelings on an issue, sure that's fine, but 'rallying the troops' into a political organization using your music as a label for that idea instead of leaving your music alone as simply a piece of expression or art isn't as ok, it's compromising.
Oomph does not do that, nothing about thier music is some political beacon to appeal to anything outside of music and music alone.