Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan
McCann, Dice, Pooles, and that one boy from Florida?
Also, ABC attacks pedophiles for using their right to free speech on the net.
I am defending pedophilia, yes. I believe someone should be free to think whatever they want to think. The thought in and of itself does no harm. No, I'm not a pedophile by any stretch of the word. I like my women much older.
Sure, but on the other hand I'm sure most pedophiles don't abduct children.
Yes it is.
Strangely enough I don't think actually having possession of child porn should be criminally punishable. I believe in a free market and a right to sell, buy, and own property(/ies) you have ownership of. That is to say if someone rightfully paid for child pornography they should have the right to own, sell, or do whatever they want to do with it as long as they're not harming a non-consenting party.
On the other hand, I agree that the acts that go into making child pornography are very wrong. The child is not old enough to legally consent to acts which may be considered pornographic, and penetrating an underdeveloped child will cause bodilly harm. On the other hand, if the law stated a 9 year old were old enough to consent than I wouldn't look at a 9 year old consenting to pornographic acts as necesarilly bad or wrong.
I think I may have just officially gotten exiled from the MB community.
|
How the hell can you say it is OK to be in possession of child porn? you are saying it is OK to rape small children?
OK you say the method of making childporn is wrong but it's still ok? You seem like an extremely messed up person who is trying to have such extreme views because you are such a deeply intellectual person, give me a ****ing break.
I already said although i was 17 I find men looking at me deeply disturbing. So your 'logic' in your last statement is BS.
Pedophilia and other sexual crimes are rarely about wanking or sexual enjoyment. It's about power, control, being generally disturbed amongst other things.