Quote:
Originally Posted by The-Starving-Artless
i knew there would be a time when my username would apply somewhere.
btw, the dog wasn't starving.
The whole point of the exhibit was to show you that no one gives a **** about a starving dog when you see it wandering around, but all of a sudden it's in an art gallery and it's animal cruelty. People live with food and resources in their homes and there are animals starving in the town you live in, probably... is that animal cruelty?
it's as much art as any other thing in the art gallery
|
I'd slap you if I could you are such a reject.
Why could he not have taken a picture of the poor dog then nursed it back to health and taken another picture?
His reasons behind it are understandable but he is being a hypocrite, I used to work in an animal sanctuary starving animals are nothing to brush off as if they are meaningless.
WHY are things like this allowed? I'd have stolen the dog.