Originally Posted by Oomph!

O really? You think think Led Zepplin and the Who were commercially saturated and/or corporate bands?

Originally Posted by Oomph!

I'm sure there a many people on this board who would take the liberty of saying Led Zepplin or the Who are indeed 'pop music' if it conveniently suited thier response at the time.

Originally Posted by Oomph!

Wait, first of all, since when has it been generally believed that Pink Floyd or Led Zepplin were 'full of themselves' or 'shallow'? And secondly, punk was anti-establishment not anti-people-who-are-full-of-themselves. Led Zepplin and Pink Floyd weren't the 'establishment', pop bands were.

Originally Posted by Oomph!

And pop music was/is about building those pretenses and reinforcing them, hence them being opposites.

Originally Posted by Oomph!

No one said that, so what does it matter? That isn't what this thread is about so no one cares about you chanting the 'buzzcocks'.