Quote:
Originally Posted by Oomph!
I think we've had this converstation before.
What about David Bowie? Experimental Rock =/= Pop. Besides, I don't think he particularly 'exciting', not necessarily lame but not that good.
What is with you pop elitists thinking that just because a band is more popular it's better. I don't give a s*** how highly the Beatles are regarded by everyone, it doesn't change the objective fact that they were lame. I don't care how many lists they appear on, how many times they are on rolling stone, etc.
|
Pop elitists? You're the one dismissing entire genres and calling your ridiculous opinions objective fact. You don't find Bowie's work exciting? Fine, but it certainly doesn't suck and it sure as hell isn't experimental rock.